EquipmentShare.com vs PROG
EQPT and PRG side by side, both in miscellaneous equipment rental and leasing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EQPT and PRG compare
EquipmentShare.com is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as PROG ($3.9B against $1.5B).
PROG keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.5% compared with 1.4% at EquipmentShare.com.
PROG pays a dividend yielding 1.4%; EquipmentShare.com does not pay one.
PROG scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 1 for EquipmentShare.com), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EQPT | PRG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.9B | $1.5B |
| Share price | $15.42 | $38.38 |
| Change, 1 year | – | 36.0% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −19.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 1.35 |
| Employees | 8,206 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 10.3× |
| P/S | 0.7× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 3.1× | 1.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.3× | 5.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 4.7× |
| PEG | – | 0.44 |
| FCF yield | – | 21.1% |
| Fair value | $13.85 | $55.26 |
| Margin of safety | −11.4% | 30.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | – | 15.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −0.61% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −8.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −6.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.2% | – |
| Operating margin | 7.1% | 8.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.4% | 5.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 11.4% |
| Return on equity | 8.3% | 20.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.8% | 30.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.38 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.63 | – |
| Interest coverage | 1.3× | 3.5× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.45 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.45 | 3.59 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 14.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 25.8% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 4.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 42.6% | 108% |
| Held by insiders | 43.4% | 3.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$39.9M | −$183K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.5% | 9.4% |
Go deeper
- EQPT stock overview
- EQPT income statement
- EQPT valuation and score
- PRG stock overview
- PRG income statement
- PRG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.