Equinix vs Public Storage
EQIX and PSA side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EQIX and PSA compare
Equinix is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Public Storage ($106B against $62.3B).
On earnings, Public Storage is cheaper: it trades at 34.9× trailing earnings, against 64.4× for Equinix.
Equinix grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.1% versus 5.2% for Public Storage).
Public Storage keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 37.8% compared with 16.4% at Equinix.
Both pay dividends: Equinix yields 1.9% and Public Storage 3.6%.
Equinix scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 9 for Public Storage), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EQIX | PSA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $106B | $62.3B |
| Share price | $1072.77 | $333.33 |
| Change, 1 year | 30.7% | 20.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 36.0% | 0.48% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 0.72 |
| Employees | 14K | 5,770 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 64.4× | 34.9× (better) |
| P/S | 10.6× (better) | 12.4× |
| P/B | 7.3× | 4.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.1× | 17.7× (better) |
| PEG | 3.00 | – |
| Fair value | $725.12 | $242.85 |
| Margin of safety | −47.9% | −37.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.1% (better) | 5.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.0% | 10.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 53.9% (better) | 0.44% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 52.5% (better) | −0.83% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 26.9% (better) | 7.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 51.6% | – |
| Operating margin | 22.5% | – |
| Net margin | 16.4% | 37.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.5% | 16.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 18.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.01 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.10 |
| Interest coverage | 3.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.29 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 2.80 | 2.81 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.9% | 3.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 122% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 9 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 12.0% (better) | 8.4% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.9% | 3.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.7% | 81.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.27% | 9.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$57.4M | −$772K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.8% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- EQIX stock overview
- EQIX income statement
- EQIX valuation and score
- PSA stock overview
- PSA income statement
- PSA valuation and score
Other comparisons
- AMT vs EQIX
- CUBE vs PSA
- DLR vs EQIX
- EQIX vs IRM
- EQIX vs JAN
- EQIX vs PLD
- EXR vs PSA
- IRM vs PSA
- LINE vs PSA
- O vs PSA
- PSA vs SPG
- PSA vs VICI
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.