Equinix vs Iron Mountain
EQIX and IRM side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EQIX and IRM compare
Equinix is the larger company, worth 3.1 times as much as Iron Mountain ($104B against $33.9B).
On earnings, Equinix is cheaper: it trades at 63.3× trailing earnings, against 74.3× for Iron Mountain.
Iron Mountain grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.5% versus 11.1% for Equinix).
Both pay dividends: Equinix yields 1.9% and Iron Mountain 3.0%.
Equinix scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 7 for Iron Mountain), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EQIX | IRM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $104B | $33.9B |
| Share price | $1053.79 | $113.75 |
| Change, 1 year | 29.6% | 16.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 33.6% | 144% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 14K | 12K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 63.3× (better) | 74.3× |
| P/S | 10.4× | 4.3× (better) |
| P/B | 7.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 22.7× | 19.7× (better) |
| PEG | 2.94 | – |
| FCF yield | – | −1.6% |
| Fair value | $724.03 | $69.46 |
| Margin of safety | −45.5% (better) | −63.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.1% | 17.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.0% | 10.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 53.9% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 52.5% | 189% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 26.9% (better) | −16.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 51.6% | 53.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 22.5% (better) | 19.5% |
| Net margin | 16.4% | – |
| FCF margin | – | −6.9% |
| Return on equity | 11.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 18.2% (better) | 7.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 6.74 |
| Interest coverage | 3.7× (better) | 1.7× |
| Current ratio | 1.29 (better) | 0.55 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.76 (better) | 1.35 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.9% | 3.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 122% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 9 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 12.0% (better) | 5.4% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.9% | 3.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.7% | 86.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.27% | 0.82% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$57.4M (better) | −$114M |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.8% | 2.4% |
Go deeper
- EQIX stock overview
- EQIX income statement
- EQIX valuation and score
- IRM stock overview
- IRM income statement
- IRM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.