Entegris vs Karat Packaging
ENTG and KRT side by side, both in miscellaneous plastics products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ENTG and KRT compare
Entegris is the larger company, worth 34 times as much as Karat Packaging ($22.5B against $667M).
On earnings, Karat Packaging is cheaper: it trades at 14.2× trailing earnings, against 57.6× for Entegris.
Karat Packaging grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.0% versus 9.4% for Entegris).
Entegris keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.1% compared with 9.4% at Karat Packaging.
Both pay dividends: Entegris yields 0.27% and Karat Packaging 5.4%.
Karat Packaging scores higher on the StockData Score (26 against 14 for Entegris), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ENTG | KRT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $22.5B | $667M |
| Share price | $147.41 | $33.45 |
| Change, 1 year | 75.4% | 52.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −4.3% | 59.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.02 | 0.79 |
| Employees | 7,700 | 696 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 26 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 57.6× | 14.2× (better) |
| P/S | 6.4× | 1.3× (better) |
| P/B | – | 4.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 31.9× | 9.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 36.6× | 10.3× (better) |
| PEG | 28.59 | 1.50 (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.7% | 9.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $110.07 | $45.00 |
| Margin of safety | −33.9% | 25.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.4% | 11.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.4% (better) | 9.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 36.2% | 56.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 35.4% | 57.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −6.4% | 6.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 47.1% (better) | 40.3% |
| Operating margin | 18.2% (better) | 11.8% |
| Net margin | 11.1% (better) | 9.4% |
| FCF margin | 17.5% (better) | 12.8% |
| Return on equity | – | 29.8% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 33.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.14 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.64 (better) | −0.29 |
| Interest coverage | 3.4× | 34.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.66 (better) | 1.83 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.35 | 5.93 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.27% | 5.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 15.6% | 76.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.6% | 114% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.27% | 5.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 108% | 35.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.58% | 57.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$50.7M | −$593K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.6% | 7.8% |
Go deeper
- ENTG stock overview
- ENTG income statement
- ENTG valuation and score
- KRT stock overview
- KRT income statement
- KRT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.