Devon Energy vs Occidental Petroleum
DVN and OXY side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DVN and OXY compare
Devon Energy and Occidental Petroleum are about the same size, with market caps of $51.2B and $58.7B.
On earnings, Occidental Petroleum is cheaper: it trades at 7.9× trailing earnings, against 11.6× for Devon Energy.
Occidental Petroleum grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (34.7% versus 27.1% for Devon Energy).
Both pay dividends: Devon Energy yields 2.4% and Occidental Petroleum 1.8%.
Occidental Petroleum scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 9 for Devon Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DVN | OXY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $51.2B | $58.7B |
| Share price | $46.58 | $58.75 |
| Change, 1 year | 32.3% | 40.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 14.7% | 102% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.60 | 0.43 |
| Employees | 2,200 | 6,793 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.6× | 7.9× (better) |
| P/S | 2.3× (better) | 2.4× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.3× | 4.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 9.8× (better) | 10.0× |
| FCF yield | 10.2% (better) | 10.0% |
| Fair value | $40.28 | $78.58 |
| Margin of safety | −15.7% | 25.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.1% | 34.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 28.9% (better) | 3.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 32.3% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −5.9% | 438% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 16.2% | – |
| FCF margin | 23.5% (better) | 23.5% |
| Return on equity | 12.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.27 (better) | 0.27 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.11 | 0.55 (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.70 | 1.38 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.59 | 1.84 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% (better) | 1.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 4 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 3.2% |
| Buyback yield | 1.8% (better) | −0.24% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.2% (better) | 1.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.4% | 83.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.78% | 0.39% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.4M | $445K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.5% | 2.7% |
Go deeper
- DVN stock overview
- DVN income statement
- DVN valuation and score
- OXY stock overview
- OXY income statement
- OXY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.