Duolingo vs Figma
DUOL and FIG side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DUOL and FIG compare
Figma is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Duolingo ($10.1B against $7.4B).
Figma grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (44.4% versus 22.6% for Duolingo).
Duolingo keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.3% compared with −40.2% at Figma.
Duolingo scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for Figma), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DUOL | FIG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.4B | $10.1B |
| Share price | $157.42 | $18.92 |
| Change, 1 year | −19.2% | −57.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 15.8% | 137% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.26 | 2.80 |
| Employees | 720 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 52.8× | – |
| P/S | 6.2× (better) | 7.2× |
| P/B | 5.0× (better) | 6.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 37.7× | – |
| P/FCF | 18.1× (better) | 44.9× |
| FCF yield | 5.5% (better) | 2.2% |
| Fair value | $127.67 | $6.93 |
| Margin of safety | −23.3% (better) | −173% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 22.6% | 44.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 45.0% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −62.2% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −62.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 72.8% | 81.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 12.4% (better) | −40.7% |
| Net margin | 12.3% (better) | −40.2% |
| FCF margin | 34.4% (better) | 16.0% |
| Return on equity | 10.5% (better) | −38.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 41.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 2.75 (better) | 2.45 |
| Altman Z-score | 8.06 (better) | 5.79 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 85.3% | 69.0% |
| Held by insiders | 15.9% | 45.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$41.9M (better) | −$88.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 18.2% | 12.1% |
Go deeper
- DUOL stock overview
- DUOL income statement
- DUOL valuation and score
- FIG stock overview
- FIG income statement
- FIG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.