Distribution Solutions vs Willis Lease Finance
DSGR and WLFC side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DSGR and WLFC compare
Distribution Solutions is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Willis Lease Finance ($1.6B against $973M).
On earnings, Willis Lease Finance is cheaper: it trades at 11.5× trailing earnings, against 146× for Distribution Solutions.
Willis Lease Finance grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.3% versus 6.6% for Distribution Solutions).
Willis Lease Finance keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with 0.54% at Distribution Solutions.
Willis Lease Finance pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Distribution Solutions does not pay one.
Willis Lease Finance scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 3 for Distribution Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DSGR | WLFC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.6B | $973M |
| Share price | $35.00 | $46.04 |
| Change, 1 year | 29.2% | 13.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 39.3% | 256% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.60 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 1,740 | 475 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 146× | 11.5× (better) |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 1.3× |
| P/B | 2.4× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.0× | 4.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 77.6× | 3.9× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.04 |
| FCF yield | 1.3% | 25.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $22.29 | $82.90 |
| Margin of safety | −57.0% | 44.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.6% | 17.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 41.3% (better) | 20.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −25.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −28.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −26.0% | 71.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.5% | – |
| Operating margin | 3.5% | 15.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.54% | 12.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.99% | 32.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 1.7% | 13.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.2% | 30.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.14 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.49 | – |
| Interest coverage | 1.4× (better) | 0.9× |
| Current ratio | 2.47 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 2.37 (better) | 0.76 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 12.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.5% | 57.7% |
| Held by insiders | 79.9% | 56.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $297K (better) | −$21.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.9% | 18.2% |
Go deeper
- DSGR stock overview
- DSGR income statement
- DSGR valuation and score
- WLFC stock overview
- WLFC income statement
- WLFC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.