Dover vs Ingersoll Rand
DOV and IR side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DOV and IR compare
Ingersoll Rand is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Dover ($32.7B against $27.9B).
On earnings, Ingersoll Rand is cheaper: it trades at 24.0× trailing earnings, against 24.5× for Dover.
Dover grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.2% versus 8.0% for Ingersoll Rand).
Ingersoll Rand keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.2% compared with 13.6% at Dover.
Both pay dividends: Dover yields 0.99% and Ingersoll Rand 0.07%.
Dover scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 17 for Ingersoll Rand), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DOV | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $27.9B | $32.7B |
| Share price | $209.95 | $85.06 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.3% | 9.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 19.3% | 38.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 1.11 |
| Employees | 24K | 21K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 17 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 24.5× | 24.0× (better) |
| P/S | 3.3× (better) | 4.1× |
| P/B | 3.7× | 3.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.3× | 15.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 23.5× | 21.5× (better) |
| PEG | 10.72 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.3% | 4.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $170.06 | $125.63 |
| Margin of safety | −23.5% | 32.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.2% (better) | 8.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.9% | 14.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −48.1% | 154% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −47.2% | 163% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.7% | 43.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 17.0% | 22.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 13.6% | 17.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 13.9% | 18.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 15.2% (better) | 13.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 11.9% (better) | 11.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.52 | 0.45 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.22 (better) | 1.42 |
| Interest coverage | 12.7× (better) | 7.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.95 (better) | 1.69 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.49 (better) | 3.63 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.99% (better) | 0.07% |
| Payout ratio | 24.1% | 2.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.2% (better) | 3.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.2% (better) | 3.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.5% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 0.48% | 0.21% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$38.3M (better) | −$59.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.3% | 3.8% |
Go deeper
- DOV stock overview
- DOV income statement
- DOV valuation and score
- IR stock overview
- IR income statement
- IR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.