Dover vs Ingersoll Rand
DOV and IR side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DOV and IR compare
Dover and Ingersoll Rand are about the same size, with market caps of $28.0B and $31.1B.
On earnings, Ingersoll Rand is cheaper: it trades at 22.5× trailing earnings, against 25.0× for Dover.
Ingersoll Rand grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.0% versus 7.6% for Dover).
Ingersoll Rand keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.2% compared with 13.5% at Dover.
Both pay dividends: Dover yields 1.0% and Ingersoll Rand 0.10%.
Ingersoll Rand scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 16 for Dover), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DOV | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $28.0B | $31.1B |
| Share price | $207.74 | $80.05 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.9% | 0.44% |
| Change, 5 years | 21.3% | 39.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.98 | 1.14 |
| Employees | 24K | 21K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.0× | 22.5× (better) |
| P/S | 3.3× (better) | 3.9× |
| P/B | 3.6× | 3.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.6× | 14.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 23.8× | 20.5× (better) |
| PEG | 10.96 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.2% | 4.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $166.75 | $127.42 |
| Margin of safety | −24.6% | 37.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.6% | 8.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.9% | 14.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −50.5% | 154% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −49.9% | 163% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.6% | 43.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 16.9% | 22.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 13.5% | 17.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 14.0% | 18.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 15.0% (better) | 13.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 11.5% (better) | 11.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.51 | 0.45 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.21 (better) | 1.42 |
| Interest coverage | 12.5× (better) | 7.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.98 (better) | 1.69 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.47 (better) | 3.51 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.0% (better) | 0.10% |
| Payout ratio | 24.8% | 2.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.0% | 3.2% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.0% | 3.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.4% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 0.47% | 0.21% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$20.0M (better) | −$58.5M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.7% | 3.5% |
Go deeper
- DOV stock overview
- DOV income statement
- DOV valuation and score
- IR stock overview
- IR income statement
- IR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.