Dover vs Terex
DOV and TEX side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DOV and TEX compare
Dover is the larger company, worth 4.4 times as much as Terex ($27.9B against $6.4B).
On earnings, Dover is cheaper: it trades at 24.5× trailing earnings, against 28.8× for Terex.
Terex grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (40.1% versus 8.2% for Dover).
Dover keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.6% compared with 2.6% at Terex.
Both pay dividends: Dover yields 0.99% and Terex 0.90%.
Dover scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 9 for Terex), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DOV | TEX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $27.9B | $6.4B |
| Share price | $209.95 | $56.94 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.3% | 24.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 19.3% | 23.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 1.36 |
| Employees | 24K | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 24.5× (better) | 28.8× |
| P/S | 3.3× | 0.9× (better) |
| P/B | 3.7× | 1.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.3× | 11.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 23.5× | – |
| PEG | 10.72 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.3% | – |
| Fair value | $170.06 | $41.03 |
| Margin of safety | −23.5% (better) | −38.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.2% | 40.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.9% | 12.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −48.1% | 26.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −47.2% | −15.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.7% (better) | 17.1% |
| Operating margin | 17.0% (better) | 5.7% |
| Net margin | 13.6% (better) | 2.6% |
| FCF margin | 13.9% | – |
| Return on equity | 15.2% (better) | 5.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 11.9% (better) | 6.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.52 (better) | 0.52 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.22 (better) | 3.02 |
| Interest coverage | 12.7× (better) | 2.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.95 (better) | 1.76 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.49 (better) | 2.06 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.99% (better) | 0.90% |
| Payout ratio | 24.1% | 34.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.2% (better) | 1.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.2% (better) | 2.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.5% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 0.48% | 1.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$38.3M | −$2.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.3% | 7.6% |
Go deeper
- DOV stock overview
- DOV income statement
- DOV valuation and score
- TEX stock overview
- TEX income statement
- TEX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.