AMCON Distributing vs Dominos Pizza
DIT and DPZ side by side, both in groceries and related products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DIT and DPZ compare
Dominos Pizza is the larger company, worth 178 times as much as AMCON Distributing ($10.8B against $60.7M).
On earnings, Dominos Pizza is cheaper: it trades at 18.1× trailing earnings, against 24.7× for AMCON Distributing.
AMCON Distributing grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.9% versus 4.5% for Dominos Pizza).
Dominos Pizza keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with 0.08% at AMCON Distributing.
Both pay dividends: AMCON Distributing yields 0.58% and Dominos Pizza 2.3%.
Dominos Pizza scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 12 for AMCON Distributing), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DIT | DPZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $60.7M | $10.8B |
| Share price | $62.24 | $328.60 |
| Change, 1 year | −20.2% | −19.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −44.6% | −38.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.15 | 0.75 |
| Employees | 1,465 | 10K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 | 5 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 24.7× | 18.1× (better) |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 2.1× |
| P/B | 0.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.0× (better) | 14.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 17.0× |
| PEG | – | 1.52 |
| FCF yield | −22.5% | 5.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $218.47 | $413.71 |
| Margin of safety | 71.5% (better) | 20.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.9% (better) | 4.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.3% (better) | 3.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 315% (better) | 3.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 306% (better) | 6.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −32.7% | 7.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 6.1% | 40.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 0.44% | 19.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.08% | 12.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.44% | 12.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 2.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 6.8% | 110% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.09 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.44 (better) | 4.28 |
| Interest coverage | 1.4× | 5.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.34 (better) | 0.49 |
| Altman Z-score | 8.67 (better) | 2.08 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 2.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 27.7% | 41.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 12 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −29.4% | 17.4% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.58% | 5.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 10.8% | 112% |
| Held by insiders | 75.0% | 0.63% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$16.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.41% | 7.0% |
Go deeper
- DIT stock overview
- DIT income statement
- DIT valuation and score
- DPZ stock overview
- DPZ income statement
- DPZ valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.