AMCON Distributing vs Dominos Pizza
DIT and DPZ side by side, both in groceries and related products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DIT and DPZ compare
Dominos Pizza is the larger company, worth 170 times as much as AMCON Distributing ($10.4B against $61.0M).
On earnings, Dominos Pizza is cheaper: it trades at 17.3× trailing earnings, against 33.0× for AMCON Distributing.
AMCON Distributing grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.5% versus 4.5% for Dominos Pizza).
Dominos Pizza keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with 0.06% at AMCON Distributing.
Both pay dividends: AMCON Distributing yields 0.77% and Dominos Pizza 2.5%.
Dominos Pizza scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 15 for AMCON Distributing), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DIT | DPZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $61.0M | $10.4B |
| Share price | $62.50 | $313.71 |
| Change, 1 year | −19.5% | −22.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −26.8% | −36.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.15 | 0.77 |
| Employees | 756 | 10K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 33.0× | 17.3× (better) |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 2.0× |
| P/B | 0.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.8× (better) | 13.8× |
| P/FCF | 22.4× | 16.3× (better) |
| PEG | – | 1.45 |
| FCF yield | 4.5% | 6.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $241.82 | $431.31 |
| Margin of safety | 74.2% (better) | 27.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.5% (better) | 4.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.1% (better) | 3.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 36.8% (better) | 3.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 32.4% (better) | 6.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −37.6% | 7.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 6.3% | 40.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 0.44% | 19.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.06% | 12.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.09% | 12.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 1.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 7.0% | 110% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.04 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.18 (better) | 4.28 |
| Interest coverage | 1.3× | 5.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.75 (better) | 0.49 |
| Altman Z-score | 8.68 (better) | 2.04 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 2.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 36.4% | 41.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 12 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | 17.4% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.77% | 6.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 10.8% | 111% |
| Held by insiders | 48.7% | 0.59% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$14.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.16% | 7.9% |
Go deeper
- DIT stock overview
- DIT income statement
- DIT valuation and score
- DPZ stock overview
- DPZ income statement
- DPZ valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.