Dine Brands Global vs Portillo's
DIN and PTLO side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DIN and PTLO compare
Dine Brands Global and Portillo's are about the same size, with market caps of $467M and $516M.
On earnings, Portillo's is cheaper: it trades at 30.9× trailing earnings, against 108× for Dine Brands Global.
Dine Brands Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.6% versus 4.2% for Portillo's).
Portillo's keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.3% compared with 0.44% at Dine Brands Global.
Dine Brands Global pays a dividend yielding 2.1%; Portillo's does not pay one.
Dine Brands Global scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for Portillo's), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DIN | PTLO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $467M | $516M |
| Share price | $36.88 | $6.79 |
| Change, 1 year | 45.0% | 45.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −53.7% | −84.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.95 | 1.08 |
| Employees | 992 | 7,890 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 108× | 30.9× (better) |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | – | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.9× (better) | 11.7× |
| P/FCF | – | 41.0× |
| PEG | – | 11.88 |
| FCF yield | −0.39% | 2.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $55.67 | $7.92 |
| Margin of safety | 33.8% (better) | 14.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.6% (better) | 4.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.0% | 10.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −88.1% | −29.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −84.8% | −38.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.1% | – |
| Operating margin | – | 5.3% |
| Net margin | 0.44% | 2.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.19% | 1.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 3.6% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 4.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.67 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.14 |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.8× |
| Current ratio | 0.87 (better) | 0.27 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.79 | 0.80 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% | – |
| Payout ratio | 356% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 3.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | 14.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 16.3% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 59.6% |
| Held by insiders | 17.1% | 47.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $187K | $2.1M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 28.2% | 25.2% |
Go deeper
- DIN stock overview
- DIN income statement
- DIN valuation and score
- PTLO stock overview
- PTLO income statement
- PTLO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.