Coty vs Estee Lauder Companies
COTY and EL side by side, both in soap, detergents, and cleaning preparations; perfumes, cosmetics, and other toilet preparations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COTY and EL compare
Estee Lauder Companies is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as Coty ($40.6B against $3.6B).
Estee Lauder Companies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.8% versus −0.24% for Coty).
Estee Lauder Companies pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Coty does not pay one.
Estee Lauder Companies scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 3 for Coty), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COTY | EL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.6B | $40.6B |
| Share price | $4.06 | $112.33 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.4% | 25.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −60.8% | −68.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.00 | 1.17 |
| Employees | 11K | 57K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 112× |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 2.7× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 10.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.6× (better) | 24.5× |
| P/FCF | 8.5× (better) | 26.8× |
| FCF yield | 11.8% (better) | 3.7% |
| Fair value | $3.70 | $66.49 |
| Margin of safety | −9.7% (better) | −68.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.24% | 5.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.6% (better) | −1.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −42.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 62.6% | 76.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | −1.7% | 6.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −9.7% | – |
| FCF margin | 7.3% | 9.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | −16.7% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −1.2% | 6.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.89 (better) | 1.67 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.71 | 1.97 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −0.6× | 3.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.75 | 1.25 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.02 | 3.36 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −7.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.15% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 44.1% | 63.5% |
| Held by insiders | 61.5% | 54.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $213K (better) | −$24.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.7% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- COTY stock overview
- COTY income statement
- COTY valuation and score
- EL stock overview
- EL income statement
- EL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.