Coty vs Estee Lauder Companies
COTY and EL side by side, both in soap, detergents, and cleaning preparations; perfumes, cosmetics, and other toilet preparations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COTY and EL compare
Estee Lauder Companies is the larger company, worth 13 times as much as Coty ($39.5B against $3.0B).
Estee Lauder Companies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.0% versus −1.5% for Coty).
Estee Lauder Companies pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; Coty does not pay one.
Estee Lauder Companies scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for Coty), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COTY | EL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.0B | $39.5B |
| Share price | $3.40 | $109.23 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.9% | 12.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −63.4% | −68.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | 1.18 |
| Employees | 11K | 57K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 218× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 2.6× |
| P/B | 1.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.1× (better) | 27.5× |
| P/FCF | 8.6× (better) | 30.0× |
| FCF yield | 11.6% (better) | 3.3% |
| Fair value | $4.42 | $47.13 |
| Margin of safety | 23.2% (better) | −132% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.5% | 5.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.6% (better) | −1.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −42.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 62.9% | 75.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | −1.4% | 5.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −10.4% | – |
| FCF margin | 6.0% | 8.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | −18.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −0.98% | 4.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.02 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.17 | 2.42 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −0.4× | 2.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.75 | 1.22 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.07 | 3.27 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −7.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.18% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 44.1% | 63.5% |
| Held by insiders | 61.5% | 54.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $213K (better) | −$1.0B |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.0% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- COTY stock overview
- COTY income statement
- COTY valuation and score
- EL stock overview
- EL income statement
- EL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.