ConocoPhillips vs Equinor ASA
COP and EQNR side by side, both in petroleum refining. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COP and EQNR compare
ConocoPhillips grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.3% versus 2.6% for Equinor ASA).
ConocoPhillips keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.1% compared with 4.7% at Equinor ASA.
ConocoPhillips pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Equinor ASA does not pay one.
ConocoPhillips scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 3 for Equinor ASA), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COP | EQNR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $166B | – |
| Share price | $137.86 | $41.33 |
| Change, 1 year | 56.3% | 70.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 98.0% | 67.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.49 | 0.13 |
| Employees | 9,900 | 21K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.5× | – |
| P/S | 2.4× | – |
| P/B | 2.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.1× | – |
| Fair value | $148.27 | – |
| Margin of safety | 7.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.3% (better) | 2.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 25.7% (better) | 18.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 30.6% (better) | −42.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 34.5% (better) | −37.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 62.2% (better) | 48.2% |
| Operating margin | – | 23.8% |
| Net margin | 17.1% (better) | 4.7% |
| FCF margin | – | 5.6% |
| Return on equity | 17.7% (better) | 12.2% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 19.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.35 (better) | 0.75 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.45 (better) | 0.71 |
| Current ratio | 1.52 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 3.10 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | – |
| Payout ratio | 35.5% | 95.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 9 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.5% | 21.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 3.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.4% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 85.1% | 6.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.08% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$146M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.3% | – |
Go deeper
- COP stock overview
- COP income statement
- COP valuation and score
- EQNR stock overview
- EQNR income statement
- EQNR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.