ConocoPhillips vs Phillips 66
COP and PSX side by side, both in petroleum refining. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COP and PSX compare
ConocoPhillips is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Phillips 66 ($166B against $101B).
On earnings, Phillips 66 is cheaper: it trades at 8.3× trailing earnings, against 14.5× for ConocoPhillips.
Phillips 66 grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.5% versus 13.3% for ConocoPhillips).
ConocoPhillips keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.1% compared with 7.5% at Phillips 66.
Both pay dividends: ConocoPhillips yields 2.4% and Phillips 66 1.9%.
Phillips 66 scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 13 for ConocoPhillips), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COP | PSX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $166B | $101B |
| Share price | $137.86 | $258.68 |
| Change, 1 year | 56.3% | 86.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 98.0% | 271% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.49 | 0.61 |
| Employees | 9,900 | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.5× | 8.3× (better) |
| P/S | 2.4× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 2.5× (better) | 2.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.1× | – |
| Fair value | $148.27 | $367.44 |
| Margin of safety | 7.0% | 29.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.3% | 27.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 25.7% (better) | 15.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 30.6% | 736% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 34.5% | 754% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 62.2% (better) | 15.1% |
| Net margin | 17.1% (better) | 7.5% |
| Return on equity | 17.7% | 41.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.35 (better) | 0.54 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.45 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.52 (better) | 1.34 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.10 | 3.93 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% (better) | 1.9% |
| Payout ratio | 35.5% | 15.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 9 | 14 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.5% (better) | 5.7% |
| Buyback yield | 3.9% (better) | 3.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.4% (better) | 4.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 85.1% | 81.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.08% | 0.23% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$146M | −$55.6M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.3% | 1.9% |
Go deeper
- COP stock overview
- COP income statement
- COP valuation and score
- PSX stock overview
- PSX income statement
- PSX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.