Americold Realty Trust vs Lineage
COLD and LINE side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COLD and LINE compare
Lineage is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Americold Realty Trust ($8.1B against $4.6B).
Americold Realty Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.3% versus −0.06% for Lineage).
Americold Realty Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.0% compared with −4.2% at Lineage.
Both pay dividends: Americold Realty Trust yields 5.7% and Lineage 6.0%.
Americold Realty Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 8 for Lineage), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COLD | LINE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.6B | $8.1B |
| Share price | $16.18 | $35.40 |
| Change, 1 year | 43.3% | 4.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −49.7% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.72 | 0.46 |
| Employees | 13K | 24K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.5× | – |
| P/S | 1.7× | 1.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.5× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.8× (better) | 15.5× |
| P/FCF | – | 310× |
| FCF yield | −2.9% | 0.32% (better) |
| Fair value | $28.77 | $29.64 |
| Margin of safety | 43.8% (better) | −19.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.3% (better) | −0.06% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.2% (better) | 31.4% |
| Operating margin | 15.1% (better) | 1.4% |
| Net margin | 9.0% (better) | −4.2% |
| FCF margin | −5.1% | 0.49% (better) |
| Return on equity | 7.9% (better) | −2.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 13.2% (better) | 0.42% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.89 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 6.64 |
| Interest coverage | 2.4× (better) | 0.3× |
| Current ratio | – | 1.05 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.67 (better) | 0.54 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.7% | 6.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 111% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Shareholder yield | 5.7% | 6.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 109% | 33.7% |
| Held by insiders | 10.4% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$25.4K | $2.8M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.4% | – |
Go deeper
- COLD stock overview
- COLD income statement
- COLD valuation and score
- LINE stock overview
- LINE income statement
- LINE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.