Broadridge Financial Solutions vs MSCI
BR and MSCI side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BR and MSCI compare
MSCI is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Broadridge Financial Solutions ($47.1B against $21.9B).
On earnings, Broadridge Financial Solutions is cheaper: it trades at 20.0× trailing earnings, against 34.8× for MSCI.
MSCI grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.3% versus 8.5% for Broadridge Financial Solutions).
MSCI keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 40.3% compared with 15.0% at Broadridge Financial Solutions.
Both pay dividends: Broadridge Financial Solutions yields 2.1% and MSCI 1.2%.
Broadridge Financial Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 18 for MSCI), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BR | MSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $21.9B | $47.1B |
| Share price | $192.45 | $658.17 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.0% | 13.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 10.5% | 0.20% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.81 | 1.16 |
| Employees | 16K | 6,268 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 22 (better) | 18 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.0× (better) | 34.8× |
| P/S | 2.9× (better) | 13.7× |
| P/B | 7.7× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.2× (better) | 27.6× |
| P/FCF | 17.2× (better) | 29.9× |
| PEG | 0.92 (better) | 2.57 |
| FCF yield | 5.8% (better) | 3.3% |
| Fair value | $233.30 | $594.74 |
| Margin of safety | 17.5% (better) | −10.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.5% | 12.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.4% | 13.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 33.9% (better) | 13.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 35.2% (better) | 19.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 15.6% | 17.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.8% | 82.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 17.4% | 55.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 15.0% | 40.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 17.1% | 45.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 40.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 18.6% | 49.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.15 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.98 (better) | 3.33 |
| Interest coverage | 11.6× (better) | 6.9× |
| Current ratio | 1.24 (better) | 0.82 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.23 | 6.48 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% (better) | 1.2% |
| Payout ratio | 39.4% | 42.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 17 (better) | 11 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.1% | 19.8% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 2.8% | 4.3% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.8% | 5.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.5% | 94.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.44% | 3.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.7M | $7.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.1% | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- BR stock overview
- BR income statement
- BR valuation and score
- MSCI stock overview
- MSCI income statement
- MSCI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.