Broadridge Financial Solutions vs Global Payments
BR and GPN side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BR and GPN compare
Broadridge Financial Solutions and Global Payments are about the same size, with market caps of $21.9B and $24.3B.
Global Payments grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (48.5% versus 8.5% for Broadridge Financial Solutions).
Broadridge Financial Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.0% compared with −11.2% at Global Payments.
Both pay dividends: Broadridge Financial Solutions yields 2.1% and Global Payments 1.1%.
Broadridge Financial Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 9 for Global Payments), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BR | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $21.9B | $24.3B |
| Share price | $192.45 | $91.90 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.0% | 18.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 10.5% | −27.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.81 | 1.17 |
| Employees | 16K | 26K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 22 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 4 | 4 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.0× | – |
| P/S | 2.9× | 2.1× (better) |
| P/B | 7.7× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.2× | 11.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 17.2× | – |
| PEG | 0.92 | – |
| FCF yield | 5.8% (better) | −0.70% |
| Fair value | $233.30 | $131.86 |
| Margin of safety | 17.5% | 30.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.5% | 48.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.4% (better) | 0.75% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 33.9% (better) | −174% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 35.2% (better) | −164% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 15.6% | 24.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.8% | 61.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 17.4% (better) | 6.8% |
| Net margin | 15.0% (better) | −11.2% |
| FCF margin | 17.1% (better) | −1.5% |
| Return on equity | 40.9% (better) | −5.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 18.6% (better) | 1.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.15 | 0.97 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.98 (better) | 4.52 |
| Interest coverage | 11.6× (better) | 0.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.24 (better) | 0.82 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.23 (better) | 0.65 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% (better) | 1.1% |
| Payout ratio | 39.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 17 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.1% (better) | 5.1% |
| Buyback yield | 2.8% | 5.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.8% | 6.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.5% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 0.44% | 16.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.7M | $94.2K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.1% | 6.5% |
Go deeper
- BR stock overview
- BR income statement
- BR valuation and score
- GPN stock overview
- GPN income statement
- GPN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.