DoorDash vs Global Payments
DASH and GPN side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DASH and GPN compare
DoorDash is the larger company, worth 3.1 times as much as Global Payments ($74.8B against $24.3B).
Global Payments grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (48.5% versus 35.0% for DoorDash).
DoorDash keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.2% compared with −11.2% at Global Payments.
Global Payments pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; DoorDash does not pay one.
DoorDash scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 9 for Global Payments), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DASH | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $74.8B | $24.3B |
| Share price | $171.51 | $91.90 |
| Change, 1 year | −12.7% | 18.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −20.3% | −27.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.86 | 1.17 |
| Employees | 31K | 26K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 4.4× | 2.1× (better) |
| P/B | 7.0× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 33.7× | 11.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 27.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 3.6% (better) | −0.70% |
| Fair value | $71.10 | $131.86 |
| Margin of safety | −141% | 30.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 35.0% | 48.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 36.6% (better) | 0.75% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 23.2% (better) | −174% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −164% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 24.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 51.9% | 61.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.3% | 6.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.2% (better) | −11.2% |
| FCF margin | 15.8% (better) | −1.5% |
| Return on equity | 10.5% (better) | −5.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 17.2% (better) | 1.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.97 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.52 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.46 (better) | 0.82 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.39 (better) | 0.65 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.1% |
| Buyback yield | 1.4% | 5.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.4% | 6.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.1% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 11.4% | 16.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$235M | $94.2K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.0% | 6.5% |
Go deeper
- DASH stock overview
- DASH income statement
- DASH valuation and score
- GPN stock overview
- GPN income statement
- GPN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.