ASE Technology vs Nvidia
ASX and NVDA side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ASX and NVDA compare
Nvidia grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (83.4% versus 8.4% for ASE Technology).
Nvidia keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 63.7% compared with 6.2% at ASE Technology.
Nvidia pays a dividend yielding 0.32%; ASE Technology does not pay one.
Nvidia scores higher on the StockData Score (26 against 8 for ASE Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ASX | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $3.9T |
| Share price | $35.55 | $162.85 |
| Change, 1 year | 137% | −16.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 364% | 394% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.40 | 2.02 |
| Employees | 14K | 42K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 26 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 20.6× |
| P/S | – | 13.0× |
| P/B | – | 17.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 19.6× |
| P/FCF | – | 30.9× |
| PEG | – | 0.10 |
| FCF yield | – | 3.2% |
| Fair value | – | $306.55 |
| Margin of safety | – | 46.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.4% | 83.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.2% | 66.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 23.6% | 123% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 21.5% | 125% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.2% | 95.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 17.7% | 74.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.0% | 65.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.2% | 63.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | −3.5% | 41.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 12.1% | 117% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 9.3% | 114% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.69 | 0.15 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.22 | 0.05 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 6.9× | 427× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.26 | 4.59 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 30.31 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.32% |
| Payout ratio | – | 3.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 20.1% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.4% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 1.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.4% | 69.7% |
| Held by insiders | 25.3% | 3.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$370M (better) | −$1.9B |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 11 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 1.2% |
Go deeper
- ASX stock overview
- ASX income statement
- ASX valuation and score
- NVDA stock overview
- NVDA income statement
- NVDA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.