APi vs Rollins
APG and ROL side by side, both in business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How APG and ROL compare
APi and Rollins are about the same size, with market caps of $18.5B and $18.6B.
APi grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.4% versus 8.3% for Rollins).
Rollins keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.2% compared with 4.1% at APi.
Rollins pays a dividend yielding 1.4%; APi does not pay one.
Rollins scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 6 for APi), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | APG | ROL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $18.5B | $18.6B |
| Share price | $43.47 | $38.88 |
| Change, 1 year | 13.3% | −33.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 162% | 9.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.26 | 0.59 |
| Employees | 20K | 22K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 35.7× |
| P/S | 2.1× (better) | 4.7× |
| P/B | 5.3× (better) | 13.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 33.7× | 21.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 27.5× (better) | 27.7× |
| PEG | – | 2.69 |
| FCF yield | 3.6% (better) | 3.6% |
| Fair value | $23.04 | $38.21 |
| Margin of safety | −88.7% | −1.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.4% (better) | 8.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 17.1% (better) | 11.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 34.9% (better) | 2.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −281% | 1.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 15.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.1% | 52.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 7.2% | 18.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.1% | 13.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.6% | 16.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 10.9% | 36.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 7.9% | 38.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.02 | 0.17 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.97 | 0.13 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 20.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.18 (better) | 0.62 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.87 | 7.75 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 66.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 6 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 15.5% |
| Buyback yield | 1.4% | 1.9% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.4% | 3.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.3% | 59.3% |
| Held by insiders | 15.2% | 66.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$343M | $95.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.3% | 16.7% |
Go deeper
- APG stock overview
- APG income statement
- APG valuation and score
- ROL stock overview
- ROL income statement
- ROL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.