APi vs Rollins
APG and ROL side by side, both in business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How APG and ROL compare
APi and Rollins are about the same size, with market caps of $19.2B and $16.7B.
APi grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.4% versus 9.9% for Rollins).
Rollins keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.6% compared with 4.1% at APi.
Rollins pays a dividend yielding 2.1%; APi does not pay one.
Rollins scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 6 for APi), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | APG | ROL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $19.2B | $16.7B |
| Share price | $44.34 | $34.66 |
| Change, 1 year | 28.7% | −35.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 187% | −3.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.26 | 0.61 |
| Employees | 20K | 22K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 31.5× |
| P/S | 2.2× (better) | 4.2× |
| P/B | 5.5× (better) | 11.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 34.7× | 19.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 28.5× | 26.9× (better) |
| PEG | – | 2.37 |
| FCF yield | 3.5% | 3.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $23.01 | $38.55 |
| Margin of safety | −92.7% | 10.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.4% (better) | 9.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 17.1% (better) | 11.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 34.9% (better) | 8.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −281% | 8.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 15.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.1% | 52.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 7.2% | 18.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.1% | 13.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.6% | 15.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 10.9% | 37.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 7.9% | 38.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.02 | 0.15 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.97 | 0.12 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 21.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.18 (better) | 0.63 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.93 | 7.29 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 64.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 6 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 15.5% |
| Buyback yield | 1.3% | 1.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.3% | 3.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.9% | 58.9% |
| Held by insiders | 15.0% | 65.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$361M (better) | −$3.4B |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 16.6% |
Go deeper
- APG stock overview
- APG income statement
- APG valuation and score
- ROL stock overview
- ROL income statement
- ROL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.