Ameriprise Financial vs Price T Rowe
AMP and TROW side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMP and TROW compare
Ameriprise Financial is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Price T Rowe ($45.1B against $23.6B).
On earnings, Price T Rowe is cheaper: it trades at 11.2× trailing earnings, against 11.7× for Ameriprise Financial.
Ameriprise Financial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.8% versus 6.9% for Price T Rowe).
Price T Rowe keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.4% compared with 20.7% at Ameriprise Financial.
Both pay dividends: Ameriprise Financial yields 0.96% and Price T Rowe 4.7%.
Price T Rowe scores higher on the StockData Score (23 against 18 for Ameriprise Financial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMP | TROW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $45.1B | $23.6B |
| Share price | $520.06 | $110.69 |
| Change, 1 year | 13.2% | 7.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 73.6% | −47.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 1.36 |
| Employees | 23K | 7,773 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 | 23 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.7× | 11.2× (better) |
| P/S | 2.2× (better) | 3.1× |
| P/B | 8.8× | 2.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.4× (better) | 8.1× |
| P/FCF | 6.2× (better) | 14.8× |
| PEG | 1.24 | 0.99 (better) |
| FCF yield | 16.2% (better) | 6.8% |
| Fair value | $738.56 | $153.87 |
| Margin of safety | 29.6% (better) | 28.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.8% (better) | 6.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.6% (better) | 3.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.8% (better) | 5.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 22.0% (better) | 7.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 24.4% (better) | −1.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 32.0% |
| Net margin | 20.7% | 28.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 36.4% (better) | 20.7% |
| Return on equity | 72.0% (better) | 19.7% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 25.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.47 | 4.99 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 4.7% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 14.4% | 52.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 9 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 7.1% |
| Buyback yield | 7.7% (better) | 2.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.6% (better) | 7.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.4% | 89.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.26% | 0.81% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$65.3M | −$1.9M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.2% | 12.9% |
Go deeper
- AMP stock overview
- AMP income statement
- AMP valuation and score
- TROW stock overview
- TROW income statement
- TROW valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.