Ameriprise Financial vs LPL Financial
AMP and LPLA side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMP and LPLA compare
Ameriprise Financial is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as LPL Financial ($45.1B against $22.8B).
On earnings, Ameriprise Financial is cheaper: it trades at 11.7× trailing earnings, against 16.8× for LPL Financial.
LPL Financial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (31.0% versus 8.8% for Ameriprise Financial).
Ameriprise Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.7% compared with 6.8% at LPL Financial.
Both pay dividends: Ameriprise Financial yields 0.96% and LPL Financial 0.41%.
Ameriprise Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 17 for LPL Financial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMP | LPLA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $45.1B | $22.8B |
| Share price | $519.43 | $292.46 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.4% | −22.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 73.4% | 78.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 0.89 |
| Employees | 23K | 10K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 17 |
| Valuation score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.7× (better) | 16.8× |
| P/S | 2.2× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/B | 8.8× | 3.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.4× (better) | 7.9× |
| P/FCF | 6.1× (better) | 22.6× |
| PEG | 1.24 (better) | 10.23 |
| FCF yield | 16.3% (better) | 4.4% |
| Fair value | $737.56 | $485.07 |
| Margin of safety | 29.6% | 39.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.8% | 31.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.6% | 23.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.8% | 67.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 22.0% | 60.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 24.4% (better) | 13.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 20.7% (better) | 6.8% |
| FCF margin | 36.4% (better) | 4.9% |
| Return on equity | 72.0% (better) | 25.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.47 | 2.48 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.96% (better) | 0.41% |
| Payout ratio | 14.4% | 6.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 3.7% |
| Buyback yield | 7.7% (better) | 2.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.6% (better) | 3.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.4% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 0.26% | 0.55% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$65.3M | −$7.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.2% | 3.1% |
Go deeper
- AMP stock overview
- AMP income statement
- AMP valuation and score
- LPLA stock overview
- LPLA income statement
- LPLA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.