Amcor vs Graphic Packaging
AMCR and GPK side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMCR and GPK compare
Amcor is the larger company, worth 6.3 times as much as Graphic Packaging ($20.3B against $3.2B).
On earnings, Graphic Packaging is cheaper: it trades at 16.5× trailing earnings, against 18.7× for Amcor.
Amcor grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (37.3% versus 0.02% for Graphic Packaging).
Amcor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.5% compared with 2.2% at Graphic Packaging.
Both pay dividends: Amcor yields 5.9% and Graphic Packaging 4.0%.
Amcor scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 12 for Graphic Packaging), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMCR | GPK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $20.3B | $3.2B |
| Share price | $43.80 | $10.87 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.2% | −30.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −26.4% | −47.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.59 | 0.67 |
| Employees | 75K | 23K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.7× | 16.5× (better) |
| P/S | 0.8× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | 1.7× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.3× | 8.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 26.2× | – |
| FCF yield | 3.8% | – |
| Fair value | $45.81 | $17.36 |
| Margin of safety | 4.4% | 37.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 37.3% (better) | 0.02% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.8% (better) | 5.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 86.6% (better) | −63.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 36.8% (better) | −62.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −4.6% | 19.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 19.8% (better) | 15.5% |
| Operating margin | 7.9% (better) | 5.8% |
| Net margin | 4.5% (better) | 2.2% |
| FCF margin | 3.2% | – |
| Return on equity | 9.3% (better) | 6.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.3% (better) | 4.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.27 (better) | 1.75 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.19 (better) | 5.14 |
| Interest coverage | 2.8× (better) | 2.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.40 (better) | 1.38 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.40 (better) | 1.38 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.9% (better) | 4.0% |
| Payout ratio | 111% | 67.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 6 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.9% (better) | 4.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 119% |
| Held by insiders | 0.69% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $921K | $1.1M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 8.8% |
Go deeper
- AMCR stock overview
- AMCR income statement
- AMCR valuation and score
- GPK stock overview
- GPK income statement
- GPK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.