Amcor vs Graphic Packaging
AMCR and GPK side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMCR and GPK compare
Amcor is the larger company, worth 8.3 times as much as Graphic Packaging ($21.9B against $2.6B).
On earnings, Graphic Packaging is cheaper: it trades at 13.6× trailing earnings, against 19.9× for Amcor.
Amcor grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (56.6% versus 0.02% for Graphic Packaging).
Amcor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.7% compared with 2.2% at Graphic Packaging.
Both pay dividends: Amcor yields 5.5% and Graphic Packaging 4.9%.
Amcor scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 12 for Graphic Packaging), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMCR | GPK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $21.9B | $2.6B |
| Share price | $47.39 | $8.95 |
| Change, 1 year | 18.5% | −45.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −21.9% | −56.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.60 | 0.74 |
| Employees | 75K | 23K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.9× | 13.6× (better) |
| P/S | 0.9× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 1.9× | 0.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.3× | 7.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 17.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 5.6% | – |
| Fair value | $48.42 | $16.31 |
| Margin of safety | 2.1% | 45.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 56.6% (better) | 0.02% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.8% (better) | 5.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 116% (better) | −63.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 48.8% (better) | −62.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −4.6% | 19.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 20.0% (better) | 15.5% |
| Operating margin | 8.1% (better) | 5.8% |
| Net margin | 4.7% (better) | 2.2% |
| FCF margin | 5.2% | – |
| Return on equity | 9.4% (better) | 6.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.6% (better) | 4.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.19 (better) | 1.75 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.82 (better) | 5.14 |
| Interest coverage | 2.8× (better) | 2.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.25 | 1.38 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.40 (better) | 1.34 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.5% (better) | 4.9% |
| Payout ratio | 108% | 67.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 6 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.1% | – |
| Buyback yield | −0.02% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.5% (better) | 4.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 119% |
| Held by insiders | 0.68% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $2.6M (better) | $1.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 7.6% |
Go deeper
- AMCR stock overview
- AMCR income statement
- AMCR valuation and score
- GPK stock overview
- GPK income statement
- GPK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.