Workhorse vs Xos
WKHS and XOS side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How WKHS and XOS compare
Workhorse is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Xos ($31.5M against $24.3M).
Workhorse grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (237% versus −48.8% for Xos).
Xos keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −109% compared with −301% at Workhorse.
Xos scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for Workhorse), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | WKHS | XOS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $31.5M | $24.3M |
| Share price | $2.88 | $1.71 |
| Change, 1 year | −65.5% | −31.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −100.0% | −98.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.59 | 1.01 |
| Employees | 148 | 101 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.4× | 0.9× (better) |
| P/B | 4.4× | 1.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | −175% | −18.9% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $1.73 |
| Margin of safety | – | 1.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 237% (better) | −48.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 72.4% | 77.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | −55.3% | 11.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | −266% | −112% (better) |
| Net margin | −301% | −109% (better) |
| FCF margin | −241% | −17.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −113% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −167% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.54 | 0.05 (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.28 | 1.74 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −5.86 (better) | −7.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 4.4% | 4.9% |
| Held by insiders | – | 83.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$285K (better) | −$2.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 20.8% |
Go deeper
- WKHS stock overview
- WKHS income statement
- WKHS valuation and score
- XOS stock overview
- XOS income statement
- XOS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.