Wallbox vs XCHG
WBX and XCH side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How WBX and XCH compare
Wallbox grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−11.5% versus −40.5% for XCHG).
XCHG scores higher on the StockData Score (1 against 0 for Wallbox), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | WBX | XCH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $2.12 | $5.10 |
| Change, 1 year | −39.8% | −82.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.3% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 0.76 |
| Employees | 637 | 85 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −11.5% (better) | −40.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 49.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 46.2% |
| Operating margin | −68.4% (better) | −130% |
| Net margin | – | −129% |
| FCF margin | 6.5% | – |
| Return on equity | – | −183% |
| Return on invested capital | −52.1% (better) | −209% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.78 |
| Interest coverage | −5.5× (better) | −151.8× |
| Current ratio | – | 1.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 2 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 1.3% | 0.01% |
| Held by insiders | – | 52.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $5.0M | – |
Go deeper
- WBX stock overview
- WBX income statement
- WBX valuation and score
- XCH stock overview
- XCH income statement
- XCH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.