Western Alliance Bancorporation vs West Bancorporation
WAL and WTBA side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How WAL and WTBA compare
Western Alliance Bancorporation is the larger company, worth 16 times as much as West Bancorporation ($8.1B against $521M).
On earnings, Western Alliance Bancorporation is cheaper: it trades at 8.4× trailing earnings, against 13.0× for West Bancorporation.
Western Alliance Bancorporation grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (146% versus 15.8% for West Bancorporation).
Western Alliance Bancorporation keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 436% compared with 37.9% at West Bancorporation.
Both pay dividends: Western Alliance Bancorporation yields 2.2% and West Bancorporation 3.3%.
Western Alliance Bancorporation scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 12 for West Bancorporation), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | WAL | WTBA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.1B | $521M |
| Share price | $75.64 | $30.58 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.0% | 40.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −33.9% | −6.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.49 | 0.70 |
| Employees | 3,769 | 175 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 8.4× (better) | 13.0× |
| P/S | 35.5× | 4.8× (better) |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 1.9× |
| P/FCF | – | 9.8× |
| FCF yield | – | 10.2% |
| Fair value | $92.96 | $25.33 |
| Margin of safety | 18.6% (better) | −20.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 146% (better) | 15.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −35.7% | 0.60% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 11.1% | 26.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 11.9% | 24.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.6% (better) | −0.61% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 436% (better) | 37.9% |
| FCF margin | – | 49.7% |
| Return on equity | 13.3% | 15.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.55 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.14 | 0.23 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | 3.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 42.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 44.2% (better) | 3.5% |
| Buyback yield | 2.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.7% (better) | 3.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.3% | 50.2% |
| Held by insiders | 5.2% | 6.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.9M | −$193K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.5% | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- WAL stock overview
- WAL income statement
- WAL valuation and score
- WTBA stock overview
- WTBA income statement
- WTBA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.