VSE vs Willdan
VSEC and WLDN side by side, both in engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How VSEC and WLDN compare
VSE is the larger company, worth 3.7 times as much as Willdan ($4.1B against $1.1B).
On earnings, Willdan is cheaper: it trades at 17.3× trailing earnings, against 54.0× for VSE.
VSE grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (41.6% versus 18.1% for Willdan).
Willdan keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.8% compared with 5.5% at VSE.
VSE pays a dividend yielding 0.27%; Willdan does not pay one.
Willdan scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 14 for VSE), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | VSEC | WLDN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.1B | $1.1B |
| Share price | $147.83 | $73.59 |
| Change, 1 year | −18.1% | −20.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 145% | 97.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.46 | 1.10 |
| Employees | 1,600 | 1,814 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 54.0× | 17.3× (better) |
| P/S | 3.1× | 1.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.4× (better) | 3.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 27.7× | 15.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 18.0× |
| FCF yield | −0.03% | 5.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $136.43 | $90.91 |
| Margin of safety | −8.4% | 19.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 41.6% (better) | 18.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.9% | 11.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 296% (better) | 85.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 177% (better) | 78.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 37.8% |
| Operating margin | 9.2% (better) | 7.1% |
| Net margin | 5.5% | 8.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.08% | 8.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 3.8% | 21.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.7% | 15.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.32 | 0.19 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.81 | 0.44 (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.77 (better) | 1.37 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.51 | 4.21 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.27% | – |
| Payout ratio | 12.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.1% | – |
| Buyback yield | −30.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −30.4% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 120% | 88.6% |
| Held by insiders | 5.4% | 4.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.8M (better) | −$12.5M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 12.1% |
Go deeper
- VSEC stock overview
- VSEC income statement
- VSEC valuation and score
- WLDN stock overview
- WLDN income statement
- WLDN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.