Vera Bradley vs Weyco
VRA and WEYS side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How VRA and WEYS compare
Weyco is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Vera Bradley ($571M against $217M).
Weyco grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.5% versus −1.7% for Vera Bradley).
Weyco keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.0% compared with −3.7% at Vera Bradley.
Weyco pays a dividend yielding 5.2%; Vera Bradley does not pay one.
Weyco scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 9 for Vera Bradley), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | VRA | WEYS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $217M | $571M |
| Share price | $7.56 | $59.77 |
| Change, 1 year | 209% | 81.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −28.0% | 149% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 1,360 | 569 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 14.5× |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 2.0× |
| P/B | 1.6× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 9.4× |
| P/FCF | 7.4× (better) | 11.9× |
| FCF yield | 13.5% (better) | 8.4% |
| Fair value | $6.23 | $63.29 |
| Margin of safety | −21.3% | 5.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.7% | 1.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −10.5% | 7.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 62.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 63.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 50.4% | 51.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | −3.6% | 17.1% (better) |
| Net margin | −3.7% | 14.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 10.7% | 16.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | −7.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −7.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 12115× |
| Current ratio | 2.44 | 8.97 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.61 | 9.28 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 5.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 74.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 26.2% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.22% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 5.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 37.4% | 25.5% |
| Held by insiders | 39.5% | 39.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $959K (better) | −$855K |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.1% | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- VRA stock overview
- VRA income statement
- VRA valuation and score
- WEYS stock overview
- WEYS income statement
- WEYS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.