Vince vs Zumiez
VNCE and ZUMZ side by side, both in apparel and accessory stores. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How VNCE and ZUMZ compare
Zumiez is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Vince ($233M against $138M).
On earnings, Vince is cheaper: it trades at 18.4× trailing earnings, against 23.3× for Zumiez.
Vince grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.0% versus 3.6% for Zumiez).
Vince keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.4% compared with 1.4% at Zumiez.
Zumiez scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 9 for Vince), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | VNCE | ZUMZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $138M | $233M |
| Share price | $10.67 | $15.17 |
| Change, 1 year | 287% | −31.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 2.6% | −70.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 1.24 |
| Employees | 558 | 6,600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.4× (better) | 23.3× |
| P/S | 0.4× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 2.3× | 0.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.3× | 3.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 7.6× (better) | 9.3× |
| FCF yield | 13.1% (better) | 10.8% |
| Fair value | $6.94 | $16.35 |
| Margin of safety | −53.7% | 7.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.0% (better) | 3.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.4% (better) | −1.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 2086% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 6400% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −23.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 52.5% (better) | 36.1% |
| Operating margin | 4.3% (better) | 2.2% |
| Net margin | 2.4% (better) | 1.4% |
| FCF margin | 5.8% (better) | 2.7% |
| Return on equity | 14.1% (better) | 4.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.3% (better) | 6.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.21 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.70 | – |
| Interest coverage | 4.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.49 | 1.71 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −4.50 | 2.40 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −1.5% | 14.9% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −1.5% | 14.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 14.1% | 85.5% |
| Held by insiders | – | 25.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$49.1K (better) | −$1.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 14.0% |
Go deeper
- VNCE stock overview
- VNCE income statement
- VNCE valuation and score
- ZUMZ stock overview
- ZUMZ income statement
- ZUMZ valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.