VivoPower vs Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ)
VIVO and WAVE side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How VIVO and WAVE compare
VivoPower grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (281% versus −77.4% for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ)).
Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ) keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −9729% compared with −20971% at VivoPower.
VivoPower scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 2 for Eco Wave Power Global AB (publ)), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | VIVO | WAVE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $2.00 | $4.67 |
| Change, 1 year | −37.7% | −42.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −96.2% | −29.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.61 | −0.01 |
| Employees | 14 | 13 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 281% (better) | −77.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −72.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.0% | 57.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −14300% | −8242% (better) |
| Net margin | −20971% | −9729% (better) |
| FCF margin | −11039% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −36.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.45 | – |
| Interest coverage | −1.2× (better) | −3.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.09 | 3.49 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 11.3% | 1.2% |
| Held by insiders | 39.2% | 24.5% |
| Short interest, % of float | 26.8% | – |
Go deeper
- VIVO stock overview
- VIVO income statement
- VIVO valuation and score
- WAVE stock overview
- WAVE income statement
- WAVE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.