StockData

Vir Biotechnology vs Xencor

VIR and XNCR side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How VIR and XNCR compare

Xencor is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Vir Biotechnology ($2.8B against $1.7B).

Vir Biotechnology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1696% versus 33.5% for Xencor).

Xencor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −58.8% compared with −61.0% at Vir Biotechnology.

Vir Biotechnology scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 7 for Xencor), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricVIRXNCR
Size and price
Market cap$1.7B$2.8B
Share price$9.96$37.09
Change, 1 year74.4%158%
Change, 5 years−69.6%0.62%
Beta (5Y)0.721.03
Employees367260
StockData Score
Total score12 (better)7
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score22
Health score6 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S5.6× (better)13.8×
P/B1.9× (better)4.9×
FCF yield−8.4%−6.4% (better)
Fair value$12.60$16.35
Margin of safety21.0% (better)−127%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)1696% (better)33.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−2.1%0.47% (better)
Profitability
Operating margin−69.8% (better)−72.7%
Net margin−61.0%−58.8% (better)
FCF margin−46.8% (better)−88.0%
Return on equity−21.8%−19.9% (better)
Return on invested capital−45.2%−17.4% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.17 (better)
Interest coverage–−6.2×
Current ratio6.306.54 (better)
Altman Z-score3.116.52 (better)
Piotroski F-score33
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions86.6%113%
Held by insiders17.0%1.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$4.0M (better)−$7.5M
Short interest, % of float12.0%17.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.