Vulcan Infrastructure & Power vs TeraWulf
VIP and WULF side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How VIP and WULF compare
TeraWulf is the larger company, worth 248 times as much as Vulcan Infrastructure & Power ($5.9B against $23.6M).
TeraWulf grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.6% versus −14.1% for Vulcan Infrastructure & Power).
Vulcan Infrastructure & Power keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.96% compared with −1180% at TeraWulf.
Vulcan Infrastructure & Power scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 2 for TeraWulf), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | VIP | WULF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $23.6M | $5.9B |
| Share price | $1.28 | $11.73 |
| Change, 1 year | −32.6% | −19.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.5% | −59.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.72 | 2.30 |
| Employees | 32 | 141 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.3× | – |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 35.4× |
| P/B | – | 39.7× |
| FCF yield | – | −42.8% |
| Fair value | – | $1.88 |
| Margin of safety | – | −524% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −14.1% | 14.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 23.9% | 65.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 40.2% |
| Operating margin | −24.0% (better) | −250% |
| Net margin | 0.96% (better) | −1180% |
| FCF margin | – | −1516% |
| Return on equity | – | −1212% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | −13.7× | −2.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.41 | 0.75 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −14.86 | −0.26 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | – | −20.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −20.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 8.4% | 79.6% |
| Held by insiders | – | 20.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $5.1M (better) | −$35.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 30.2% |
Go deeper
- VIP stock overview
- VIP income statement
- VIP valuation and score
- WULF stock overview
- WULF income statement
- WULF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.