StockData

Ulta Beauty vs 111

ULTA and YI side by side, both in miscellaneous retail. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ULTA and YI compare

Ulta Beauty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.2% versus −12.8% for 111).

Ulta Beauty scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 3 for 111), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricULTAYI
Size and price
Market cap$28.2B–
Share price$659.08$2.93
Change, 1 year27.6%−28.7%
Change, 5 years61.7%−94.0%
Beta (5Y)0.771.16
Employees65K144
StockData Score
Total score11 (better)3
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score5 (better)0
Health score4 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E24.0×–
P/S2.2×–
P/B10.7×–
EV/EBITDA14.6×–
P/FCF24.5×–
PEG10.85–
FCF yield4.1%–
Fair value$481.91–
Margin of safety−36.8%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)11.2% (better)−12.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average15.0% (better)8.9%
Net income growth (TTM)0.72%–
EPS growth (TTM)5.2%–
EPS growth, 5Y average52.5%–
Profitability
Gross margin39.3% (better)5.8%
Operating margin12.5% (better)−0.02%
Net margin9.3%–
FCF margin8.9% (better)0.91%
Return on equity46.1%–
Return on invested capital45.2%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.13–
Net debt / EBITDA0.07 (better)−39.46
Interest coverage–−0.1×
Current ratio1.35 (better)1.09
Altman Z-score6.99–
Piotroski F-score7–
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield4.3%–
Shareholder yield4.3%–
Ownership
Held by institutions99.2%0.01%
Held by insiders0.26%21.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$1.8M−$369K (better)
Short interest, % of float4.8%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.