Ubiquiti vs Vistance Networks
UI and VISN side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How UI and VISN compare
Ubiquiti is the larger company, worth 23 times as much as Vistance Networks ($34.1B against $1.5B).
On earnings, Vistance Networks is cheaper: it trades at 0.2× trailing earnings, against 35.6× for Ubiquiti.
Ubiquiti grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.2% versus 23.7% for Vistance Networks).
Vistance Networks keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 399% compared with 29.3% at Ubiquiti.
Both pay dividends: Ubiquiti yields 0.60% and Vistance Networks 229%.
Ubiquiti scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 15 for Vistance Networks), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | UI | VISN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $34.1B | $1.5B |
| Share price | $563.81 | $6.54 |
| Change, 1 year | −27.1% | −58.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 82.5% | −36.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.15 | 1.76 |
| Employees | 1,321 | 4,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 22 (better) | 15 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 35.6× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/S | 10.4× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | 23.7× | 0.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 27.8× | 6.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 37.5× | 17.4× (better) |
| PEG | 1.08 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.7% | 5.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $554.02 | – |
| Margin of safety | −1.8% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.2% (better) | 23.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.5% (better) | −25.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 34.9% | 821% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 34.8% | 1054% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 46.2% (better) | 45.3% |
| Operating margin | 36.2% (better) | 1.7% |
| Net margin | 29.3% | 399% (better) |
| FCF margin | 27.8% (better) | 4.8% |
| Return on equity | 91.1% | 22304% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 120% (better) | 0.92% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.51 | −0.52 |
| Current ratio | 2.93 (better) | 2.57 |
| Altman Z-score | 31.85 (better) | 2.02 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.60% | 229% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 20.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 14.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.60% | 229% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 4.9% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 26.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$542K (better) | −$1.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.61% | 23.7% |
Go deeper
- UI stock overview
- UI income statement
- UI valuation and score
- VISN stock overview
- VISN income statement
- VISN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.