Universal Health Realty Income Trust vs Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust
UHT and WHLR side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How UHT and WHLR compare
Universal Health Realty Income Trust is the larger company, worth 4569 times as much as Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust ($540M against $118K).
Universal Health Realty Income Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.02% versus −6.9% for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust).
Universal Health Realty Income Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.3% compared with −1.6% at Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust.
Universal Health Realty Income Trust pays a dividend yielding 7.7%; Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust does not pay one.
Universal Health Realty Income Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 7 for Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | UHT | WHLR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $540M | $118K |
| Share price | $38.86 | $0.485 |
| Change, 1 year | −1.5% | −100.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −33.2% | −100% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.56 | 1.91 |
| Employees | – | 49 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.8× | – |
| P/S | 5.4× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | 3.9× | 0.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.4× (better) | −0.1× |
| Fair value | $40.06 | – |
| Margin of safety | 3.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.02% (better) | −6.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.9% | 10.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 12.4% (better) | −103% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.4% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −2.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 35.9% | 41.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 20.3% (better) | −1.6% |
| Return on equity | 13.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 19.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.27 (better) | −0.46 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.7% | – |
| Payout ratio | 206% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 15 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.7% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 62.0% | – |
| Held by insiders | 2.7% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 (better) | −$77.5K |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.1% | – |
Go deeper
- UHT stock overview
- UHT income statement
- UHT valuation and score
- WHLR stock overview
- WHLR income statement
- WHLR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.