StockData

Under Armour vs Ermenegildo Zegna

UAA and ZGN side by side, both in apparel and other finished products made from fabrics and similar materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How UAA and ZGN compare

Ermenegildo Zegna grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.5% versus −4.2% for Under Armour).

Ermenegildo Zegna keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.1% compared with −9.8% at Under Armour.

Ermenegildo Zegna scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 3 for Under Armour), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricUAAZGN
Size and price
Market cap$2.1B–
Share price$4.91$13.80
Change, 1 year2.1%32.7%
Change, 5 years−81.8%37.0%
Beta (5Y)1.240.82
Employees14K300
StockData Score
Total score310 (better)
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score04 (better)
Health score24 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.4×–
P/B1.5×–
FCF yield−4.4%–
Fair value$5.83–
Margin of safety15.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−4.2%−1.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−1.2%13.6% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–27.9%
EPS growth (TTM)–26.7%
Profitability
Gross margin46.7%67.5% (better)
Operating margin−2.5%7.3% (better)
Net margin−9.8%5.1% (better)
FCF margin−1.9%13.3% (better)
Return on equity−28.7%10.3% (better)
Return on invested capital−4.4%10.3% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.400.22 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA–−0.00
Interest coverage−2.1×2.8× (better)
Current ratio1.95 (better)1.47
Altman Z-score2.04–
Piotroski F-score47 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio–30.9%
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions92.2%17.8%
Held by insiders39.4%–
Insider net buying, 12 months$225M (better)−$814K
Superinvestors holding11

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.