StockData

Ternium vs Worthington Steel

TX and WS side by side, both in steel works, blast furnaces, and rolling and finishing mills. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How TX and WS compare

Worthington Steel grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (69.1% versus −11.6% for Ternium).

Ternium keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.7% compared with −0.72% at Worthington Steel.

Worthington Steel pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Ternium does not pay one.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricTXWS
Size and price
Market cap–$2.0B
Share price$51.54$39.46
Change, 1 year44.0%24.2%
Change, 5 years35.6%–
Beta (5Y)0.861.71
Employees33K5,400
StockData Score
Total score44
Valuation score00
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score00
Health score4 (better)1
Dividend score02 (better)
Valuation
P/S–0.4×
P/B–2.0×
EV/EBITDA–46.7×
P/FCF–43.3×
FCF yield–2.3%
Fair value–$38.18
Margin of safety–−3.3%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−11.6%69.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average12.3%–
Net income growth (TTM)–−132%
EPS growth (TTM)–−132%
EPS growth, 5Y average−11.3%–
Profitability
Gross margin15.1% (better)10.4%
Operating margin4.5% (better)0.12%
Net margin2.7% (better)−0.72%
FCF margin−2.2%0.88% (better)
Return on equity3.6% (better)−3.6%
Return on invested capital2.8% (better)0.23%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.20 (better)2.13
Net debt / EBITDA0.59 (better)19.88
Interest coverage3.3× (better)0.1×
Current ratio2.49 (better)1.81
Altman Z-score–1.53
Piotroski F-score5 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–1.6%
Years of dividend growth–0
Shareholder yield–1.6%
Ownership
Held by institutions1.4%55.0%
Held by insiders0.00%2.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$2.1M
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float–3.8%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.