TechTarget vs Ziff Davis
TTGT and ZD side by side, both in communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TTGT and ZD compare
Ziff Davis is the larger company, worth 8.7 times as much as TechTarget ($1.8B against $203M).
Ziff Davis grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.4% versus 8.0% for TechTarget).
Ziff Davis keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 43.5% compared with −24.9% at TechTarget.
Ziff Davis scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 11 for TechTarget), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TTGT | ZD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $203M | $1.8B |
| Share price | $2.81 | $51.49 |
| Change, 1 year | −45.3% | 60.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −97.4% | −57.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.42 | 1.13 |
| Employees | 500 | 3,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 3.0× |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/B | 0.4× (better) | 0.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 4.6× |
| P/FCF | 26.6× | 16.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.8% | 6.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $7.89 | $79.51 |
| Margin of safety | 64.4% (better) | 35.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.0% | 10.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 4.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 457% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 548% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −18.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 58.1% | 84.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −27.6% | 4.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −24.9% | 43.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.6% | 7.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | −22.1% | 31.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −20.9% | 2.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.41 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −2.01 |
| Current ratio | 1.19 | 2.35 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −1.57 | 2.12 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 18.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 18.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 44.2% | 120% |
| Held by insiders | – | 9.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$443K (better) | −$2.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 14.9% |
Go deeper
- TTGT stock overview
- TTGT income statement
- TTGT valuation and score
- ZD stock overview
- ZD income statement
- ZD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.