Titan America vs Vulcan Materials
TTAM and VMC side by side, both in mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals (no fuels). Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TTAM and VMC compare
Titan America grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.8% versus 1.6% for Vulcan Materials).
Vulcan Materials pays a dividend yielding 0.73%; Titan America does not pay one.
Vulcan Materials scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 5 for Titan America), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TTAM | VMC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $36.4B |
| Share price | $13.87 | $281.25 |
| Change, 1 year | −9.8% | −4.7% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 43.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.82 | 0.82 |
| Employees | 2,554 | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 33.3× |
| P/S | – | 4.6× |
| P/B | – | 4.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 17.5× |
| P/FCF | – | 46.7× |
| PEG | – | 1.42 |
| FCF yield | – | 2.1% |
| Fair value | – | $214.77 |
| Margin of safety | – | −31.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.8% (better) | 1.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 10.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −1.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 6.3% (better) | 0.36% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 13.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 26.1% | 27.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 16.1% | 20.3% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 13.8% |
| FCF margin | 8.1% | 9.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 12.9% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 9.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.56 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.49 (better) | 1.96 |
| Interest coverage | 11.9× (better) | 7.2× |
| Current ratio | 3.03 (better) | 1.43 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.95 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.73% |
| Payout ratio | – | 24.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 12 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 7.6% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.2% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 3.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 98.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.02% | 0.21% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $299K (better) | −$15.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 4 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.8% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- TTAM stock overview
- TTAM income statement
- TTAM valuation and score
- VMC stock overview
- VMC income statement
- VMC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.