TruGolf vs J-Star
TRUG and YMAT side by side, both in dolls, toys, games and sporting and athletic. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TRUG and YMAT compare
TruGolf grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−8.9% versus −43.5% for J-Star).
TruGolf scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 2 for J-Star), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TRUG | YMAT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $998K | – |
| Share price | $0.519 | $1.06 |
| Change, 1 year | −99.7% | −76.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.39 | 3.54 |
| Employees | 68 | 19 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.0× | – |
| P/B | 0.5× | – |
| FCF yield | −208% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.9% (better) | −43.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −1857% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 50.5% | 54.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −22.6% (better) | −208% |
| Net margin | −55.7% | – |
| FCF margin | −10.4% (better) | −33.9% |
| Return on equity | −349% | – |
| Return on invested capital | – | −88.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.13 (better) | 4.13 |
| Interest coverage | – | −55.2× |
| Current ratio | 0.84 | 1.26 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −3.59 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | – | 51.8% |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 3.1% |
Go deeper
- TRUG stock overview
- TRUG income statement
- TRUG valuation and score
- YMAT stock overview
- YMAT income statement
- YMAT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.