StockData

Trio-Tech International vs Velo3D

TRT and VELO side by side, both in special industry machinery, except metalworking. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How TRT and VELO compare

Velo3D is the larger company, worth 2.4 times as much as Trio-Tech International ($133M against $55.7M).

Trio-Tech International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (71.6% versus 30.9% for Velo3D).

Trio-Tech International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.05% compared with −86.2% at Velo3D.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricTRTVELO
Size and price
Market cap$55.7M$133M
Share price$5.36$4.15
Change, 1 year61.2%−28.1%
Change, 5 years18.5%−99.9%
Beta (5Y)0.81−0.05
Employees1928
StockData Score
Total score88
Valuation score13 (better)
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.9× (better)2.1×
P/B1.2×1.0× (better)
EV/EBITDA15.3×–
P/FCF33.0×–
FCF yield3.0% (better)−50.1%
Fair value$4.51$9.04
Margin of safety−18.8%54.1% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)71.6% (better)30.9%
Revenue growth, 5Y average14.0%19.4% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin16.6% (better)11.5%
Operating margin−0.33% (better)−86.2%
Net margin−0.05% (better)−86.2%
FCF margin2.7% (better)−104%
Return on equity−0.09% (better)−66.4%
Return on invested capital−0.44% (better)−110%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage−3.1× (better)−34.9×
Current ratio3.445.12 (better)
Altman Z-score3.80 (better)−2.17
Piotroski F-score5 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield0.02%–
Shareholder yield0.02% (better)0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions21.1%37.9%
Held by insiders29.8%47.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$3.0M$0 (better)
Short interest, % of float9.9%35.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.