TC Energy vs Williams Companies
TRP and WMB side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TRP and WMB compare
TC Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.7% versus 8.7% for Williams Companies).
Williams Companies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.2% compared with 23.1% at TC Energy.
Williams Companies pays a dividend yielding 2.8%; TC Energy does not pay one.
TC Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Williams Companies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TRP | WMB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $90.9B |
| Share price | $64.33 | $74.35 |
| Change, 1 year | 26.6% | 30.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 25.0% | 160% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.38 | 0.53 |
| Employees | 6,059 | 5,987 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 29.6× |
| P/S | – | 7.5× |
| P/B | – | 6.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 17.7× |
| PEG | – | 3.44 |
| FCF yield | – | −0.12% |
| Fair value | – | $50.67 |
| Margin of safety | – | −46.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.7% (better) | 8.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.2% | 9.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −25.1% | 26.5% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −26.2% | 26.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −7.2% | 66.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 98.6% | – |
| Operating margin | 52.7% (better) | 38.2% |
| Net margin | 23.1% | 25.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | −0.88% |
| Return on equity | 12.8% | 24.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 21.8% (better) | 8.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.06 (better) | 2.33 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.13 (better) | 4.37 |
| Interest coverage | 2.4× | 3.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.63 (better) | 0.48 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.32 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.8% |
| Payout ratio | 99.7% | 81.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 8 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.97% | 4.6% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.01% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 2.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 65.7% | 89.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.49% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$11.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.2% |
Go deeper
- TRP stock overview
- TRP income statement
- TRP valuation and score
- WMB stock overview
- WMB income statement
- WMB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.