StockData

Interactive Strength vs XCHG

TRNR and XCH side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How TRNR and XCH compare

Interactive Strength grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (198% versus −40.5% for XCHG).

XCHG keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −129% compared with −159% at Interactive Strength.

Interactive Strength scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 1 for XCHG), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricTRNRXCH
Size and price
Market cap$1.9M–
Share price$1.18$5.10
Change, 1 year−99.4%−82.4%
Beta (5Y)1.480.76
Employees7285
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)1
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score3 (better)0
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score4 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.1×–
P/B0.6×–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)198% (better)−40.5%
Profitability
Gross margin30.1%46.2% (better)
Operating margin−72.7% (better)−130%
Net margin−159%−129% (better)
Return on equity−337%−183% (better)
Return on invested capital−85.0% (better)−209%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.78 (better)
Interest coverage–−151.8×
Current ratio0.211.23 (better)
Altman Z-score−7.40–
Piotroski F-score6 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions0.72%0.01%
Held by insiders15.5%52.7%
Short interest, % of float2.0%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.