Terreno Realty vs Urban Edge Properties
TRNO and UE side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TRNO and UE compare
Terreno Realty is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as Urban Edge Properties ($7.1B against $2.5B).
On earnings, Terreno Realty is cheaper: it trades at 17.6× trailing earnings, against 36.9× for Urban Edge Properties.
Terreno Realty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.0% versus 7.4% for Urban Edge Properties).
Terreno Realty keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 77.3% compared with 13.7% at Urban Edge Properties.
Both pay dividends: Terreno Realty yields 3.2% and Urban Edge Properties 4.1%.
Terreno Realty scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 6 for Urban Edge Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TRNO | UE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.1B | $2.5B |
| Share price | $65.56 | $19.93 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.5% | 0.96% |
| Change, 5 years | −12.0% | 3.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 0.90 |
| Employees | 47 | 104 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.6× (better) | 36.9× |
| P/S | 14.2× | 5.1× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.8× |
| PEG | 1.22 (better) | 1.55 |
| Fair value | $66.56 | $14.64 |
| Margin of safety | 1.5% (better) | −36.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 18.0% (better) | 7.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.6% (better) | 7.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 52.9% (better) | −35.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 48.8% (better) | −35.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 27.5% (better) | −1.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 77.3% (better) | 13.7% |
| Return on equity | 9.3% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 3.51 (better) | 0.94 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.2% | 4.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 55.0% | 148% |
| Years of dividend growth | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 12.5% (better) | 2.2% |
| Buyback yield | −4.3% | 0.02% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −1.1% | 4.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 97.1% |
| Held by insiders | 1.7% | 0.17% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.8M (better) | −$3.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.0% | 2.6% |
Go deeper
- TRNO stock overview
- TRNO income statement
- TRNO valuation and score
- UE stock overview
- UE income statement
- UE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.