Trinity Industries vs Wabash National
TRN and WNC side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How TRN and WNC compare
Trinity Industries is the larger company, worth 5.1 times as much as Wabash National ($2.4B against $471M).
Trinity Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−2.4% versus −7.3% for Wabash National).
Trinity Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.4% compared with −9.1% at Wabash National.
Both pay dividends: Trinity Industries yields 4.1% and Wabash National 2.8%.
Trinity Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 6 for Wabash National), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | TRN | WNC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.4B | $471M |
| Share price | $30.54 | $11.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 20.5% | 50.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 10.1% | −36.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.04 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 2,650 | 1,100 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.6× | – |
| P/S | 1.1× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 2.1× | 1.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.2× | – |
| P/FCF | 6.7× | – |
| PEG | 0.12 | – |
| FCF yield | 14.9% (better) | −29.1% |
| Fair value | $81.94 | $20.79 |
| Margin of safety | 62.7% (better) | 44.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −2.4% (better) | −7.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.3% (better) | 0.81% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 242% (better) | −153% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 251% (better) | −156% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 24.6% (better) | 0.88% |
| Operating margin | 34.5% (better) | −10.4% |
| Net margin | 15.4% (better) | −9.1% |
| FCF margin | 16.8% (better) | −9.0% |
| Return on equity | 30.7% (better) | −40.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 63.1% (better) | −16.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 1.99 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | −6.2× |
| Current ratio | – | 1.38 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.93 | 1.47 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.1% (better) | 2.8% |
| Payout ratio | 30.5% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 15 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 9.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | 2.3% (better) | 0.14% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.3% (better) | 2.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.7% | 92.5% |
| Held by insiders | 1.6% | 5.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$502K | −$123K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.8% | 16.6% |
Go deeper
- TRN stock overview
- TRN income statement
- TRN valuation and score
- WNC stock overview
- WNC income statement
- WNC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.